Lets start a game! Lets call it LT32 and base it on the LT28?

everything else
Post Reply
User avatar
mrsynical
Member
Posts: 101
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Lets start a game! Lets call it LT32 and base it on the LT28?

Post by mrsynical »

It seems like we won't get LT31 start any time soon (I would guess not this year). Even if we got it working the 2.3 rule set is not that friendly based on past our LT30 experiences.

I suggest we get a game going as the community is dying off. Looking on the old server the last "successful" games were LT29 and LT28.

http://old.longturn.org/lt28-teamless
http://old.longturn.org/lt29-teamgame

The old forum doesn't say much about what happened to LT29, but LT28 seemed to have worked well according to Kryon ("Winners: Bli, Kryon, Det0r. I really enjoyed it. Thanks to all.")

So ... what are peoples thoughts on running a 2.2 server with the ruleset used in LT28, teamless with max 30 people?

I am willing to try and help start it up if somebody will help guide - although I am sure there are others who would be more competent.
User avatar
det0r
Member
Posts: 98
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Post by det0r »

I agree with mrsynical, let's roll back to an older ruleset (with rapture time at least 3 turns) and start a game, even if it's on FreeCiv 2.2.

I would also like to use this opportunity to point out that we shouldn't have banned terror. He would have fixed these bugs within a week and we would all be happily playing Civ right now.
User avatar
maho
Member
Posts: 130
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Post by maho »

mrsynical wrote: I am willing to try and help start it up if somebody will help guide - although I am sure there are others who would be more competent.
I'm afraid that set of people having time to help and set of ppl being more competent are disjoint :)
User avatar
ifaesfu
Member
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Post by ifaesfu »

It would be great.
Those who incited terror to do something really stupid aren't useful in this community (as much as me), while he did very good improvements for the benefit of all.
wieder
Member
Posts: 1781
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Post by wieder »

Yeah, that's a good plan. A game with 30 good players would be an interesting one.
User avatar
monamipierrot
Member
Posts: 106
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Post by monamipierrot »

I'm in. Can't wait any more.
User avatar
monamipierrot
Member
Posts: 106
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Post by monamipierrot »

det0r wrote:I would also like to use this opportunity to point out that we shouldn't have banned terror.
I agree. Not without a "trial". After all it looked more like a demonstration, as hackers do for - sometimes - good causes.
Post Reply