Longturn Forum

(T43 - 14:19:01) <(wieder)> any suggestions about what to improve/fix/change for the next ruleset version?

• Chariots and Elephants should go obsolete with Knights. Currently they persist until Dragoons.
• Make sure that the Longboat's graphic is u.longboat, not u.trireme

• Rename "Fundamentalism" to "Theocracy". That would make more sense given how it's depicted in the game. It's more like the "Papal States" than "Jihadi Empire".

• Frigates and Flagships should have a Defense equal to their Attack. Navigation-age naval warfare is much too dependent on first-strikes, with a nearly guaranteed Kill if you happen to move first, and a pitiful chance to survive if your opponent does. Let naval combat in the age of sail work like every other age: a battle of Numbers and Veterancy, not TC-moves and death from the shadows.
• Mountains should not be traversable terrain by ANY military unit (land, big land, siege...) without a road. Too much of warfare depends on "seizing a mountain", and the biggest determining factor in whether a city can be assaulted or not is whether there is a mountain nearby that can be fortified. Hills and river-forests will be the new strong terrain, and clever or adventurous people can still build roads into strategic mountains to fortify them. But by default, Mountain ranges will be obstacles that armies have to maneuver around, not vulnerabilities that doom a city.
• Building a Mine on a Hill-City should remove the free irrigation from the city center. Currently hills are the best tile in the entire game to build a city on. Period. Not only do they give you a strong defensive bonus, but they can give your city a production output equivalent to a city +2 sizes bigger! And they do this without even sacrificing the baseline of 2 food.
  Forest cities don't get 2 food.
  Swamp cities don't get 2 food.
  Why should a hill with a MINE (already an above-average tile) be able to produce 2 food? Every hill becomes as powerful as a Buffalo resource, and puts every other terrain to shame.
• Diplomats, Spies, and Explorers should not be able to let armies bypass Zones of Control. ZOC is meaningless if all it takes is one specialized unit to let an entire army move past.

Hans_Lemurson wrote:A few suggestions I recall thinking about or reading about:

• Frigates and Flagships should have a Defense equal to their Attack. Navigation-age naval warfare is much too dependent on first-strikes, with a nearly guaranteed Kill if you happen to move first, and a pitiful chance to survive if your opponent does. Let naval combat in the age of sail work like every other age: a battle of Numbers and Veterancy, not TC-moves and death from the shadows.
• Mountains should not be traversable terrain by ANY military unit (land, big land, siege...) without a road. Too much of warfare depends on "seizing a mountain", and the biggest determining factor in whether a city can be assaulted or not is whether there is a mountain nearby that can be fortified. Hills and river-forests will be the new strong terrain, and clever or adventurous people can still build roads into strategic mountains to fortify them. But by default, Mountain ranges will be obstacles that armies have to maneuver around, not vulnerabilities that doom a city.
• Building a Mine on a Hill-City should remove the free irrigation from the city center. Currently hills are the best tile in the entire game to build a city on. Period. Not only do they give you a strong defensive bonus, but they can give your city a production output equivalent to a city +2 sizes bigger! And they do this without even sacrificing the baseline of 2 food.
  Forest cities don't get 2 food.
  Swamp cities don't get 2 food.
  Why should a hill with a MINE (already an above-average tile) be able to produce 2 food? Every hill becomes as powerful as a Buffalo resource, and puts every other terrain to shame.
• Diplomats, Spies, and Explorers should not be able to let armies bypass Zones of Control. ZOC is meaningless if all it takes is one specialized unit to let an entire army move past.

• Allow Settlers to bypass ZOC. Settler movement being blocked by explorers before a military can even be created is kinda BS.

Corbeau wrote:Oh, so that isn't possible now? You can confirm it?

But is that actually a ruleset issue?

zoltan wrote:No to all

Hans_Lemurson wrote:

zoltan wrote:No to all

Care to explain any of your objections?

Hans_Lemurson wrote:

• Allow Settlers to bypass ZOC. Settler movement being blocked by explorers before a military can even be created is kinda BS.

Wahazar wrote:

Hans_Lemurson wrote:

• Allow Settlers to bypass ZOC. Settler movement being blocked by explorers before a military can even be created is kinda BS.

It is already solved in v.2.6 (explorer have HasNoZOC flag)