This whole part of discussion is happening because there are rules (which are simple and basically clear), but nobody is following them. That is the source of confusion.Wahazar wrote:Whole recruitment rules were unclear for me, maybe they are obvious for veterans. With strong emphasis on "maybe"
Team Selection
-
- Member
- Posts: 990
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
-
- Member
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
The rules were simply:Corbeau wrote:This whole part of discussion is happening because there are rules (which are simple and basically clear), but nobody is following them. That is the source of confusion.Wahazar wrote:Whole recruitment rules were unclear for me, maybe they are obvious for veterans. With strong emphasis on "maybe"
There was not mentioned, that list must to be closed, thus my confusion, why some team leaders were acting and some not.We will do a 5 team game if we can figure out who 5 team leaders we can have for picking the teams. One team leader picks at a time.
BTW, there is my future proposal of team selection procedure with precaution against acting latency:
http://forum.longturn.org/viewtopic.php?pid=8749#p8749
- Hans_Lemurson
- Member
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
-
- Member
- Posts: 990
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
I have a problem with very good players coming in later and taking "anyone who drops". When the teams are assembled, hopefully they will be balanced. Whoever drops early is far more likely to be a bad player so that team, initially balanced, will be replacing a bad player with a very good one. So the balance goes out the window.
And I'm curious, what's with the "I won't play from the start, but I'll join later" attitude? You either want to play or you don't want to play. This is a nice way to squeeze into victory behind the back of fair play.
And I'm curious, what's with the "I won't play from the start, but I'll join later" attitude? You either want to play or you don't want to play. This is a nice way to squeeze into victory behind the back of fair play.
- Hans_Lemurson
- Member
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
You aren't signed up for LT45. I guess you're just commenting in general? What problems do late drop-in replacement cause? Skilled player replacing a noob? Uncertainty about who exactly is playing what nation?fran wrote:I'm not going to play any team game where late drop in replacements are not ruled out.wieder wrote: players replacing
I also think it is a bad habit for every game.
But in any case it's going to be hard to form teams until we know for sure who all is going to play. When is the cutoff window? I thought it was last Saturday.
-
- Member
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Good question, despite of thread title http://forum.longturn.org/viewtopic.php?id=1068 signup seems to be still opened.Hans_Lemurson wrote: But in any case it's going to be hard to form teams until we know for sure who all is going to play. When is the cutoff window? I thought it was last Saturday.
BTW I was pretty sure, that game will run in Monday, according to pregame counter, thus I was so concerned why teams are not complete yet
- fran
- Member
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
The tedious process of team making by captain's picking is debased by later replacements.Hans_Lemurson wrote:What problems do late drop-in replacement cause?fran wrote:I'm not going to play any team game where late drop in replacements are not ruled out.wieder wrote: players replacing
Even more so if top players make it a habit to drop in later.
Last edited by fran on Wed Aug 22, 2018 2:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Hans_Lemurson
- Member
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
- Hans_Lemurson
- Member
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Reading up on various Discord chats (where official plans are apparently discussed without any public posts on the forums), it seems that the plan to organize teams by Ordered Preference Lists is afoot. I have modified the Original Post with the following directives:
Step 1: All Captains must choose a color!
A Captain fundamentally has to be responsible enough to speak FOR the team, and speak TO the team. They don't need to be the most skilled, just be in charge of making sure the team *works*.
Step 2: Captains should create a player preference list with as many players as they wish. A fair algorithm will distribute players onto teams.
Step 3: Players wishing to play together can arrange swaps with other teams, provided their captains do not object.
Step 1: All Captains must choose a color!
A Captain fundamentally has to be responsible enough to speak FOR the team, and speak TO the team. They don't need to be the most skilled, just be in charge of making sure the team *works*.
Step 2: Captains should create a player preference list with as many players as they wish. A fair algorithm will distribute players onto teams.
Step 3: Players wishing to play together can arrange swaps with other teams, provided their captains do not object.
- Hans_Lemurson
- Member
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
I am working on my preference list, and to help with the myriad of options, I grouped the players into 3 groups: Dangerous, Experienced, and Noobs. Please note that these lists are compiled by my own finite and fallible impressions using limited information. Players within a group are listed in their signup-order. No ranking is implied within a group.
Dangerous: These players seem to know the game well and I have either heard of their reputation, or seen them perform well in LT44, or they have just played in many games.
cgalik
chill
soon
kamBLR
Joy
Dim
Zoltan
ferg
Experienced: These players I believe are not noobs, so know how the game works and what to do, but I know of no frightening reputation.
Corbeau
sigur
rocknrolf
xandr
dion
jwrober
Alfred
Wahazar
Hans_Lemurson
Lord_P
JamesNYC
Narti
louis94
Momo
Temmikael
Noobs: These players are either first-timers, or have very few games under their belt, or I simply don't know enough about their skill.
emilio
zoe
shoter
kingi
MOLIX
anaxagoras
kunki
ghamath
Orisson
pieronjeden
wolfie31
SKB
Note: If you are in the "Noob" category and think you're better than that, don't be insulted. I'm making decisions based on limited information. Maybe somebody who is wiser than me will draft you for their team. I have only played in LT44, and maybe you've done better in other games. My rankings say more about me than you.
Dangerous: These players seem to know the game well and I have either heard of their reputation, or seen them perform well in LT44, or they have just played in many games.
cgalik
chill
soon
kamBLR
Joy
Dim
Zoltan
ferg
Experienced: These players I believe are not noobs, so know how the game works and what to do, but I know of no frightening reputation.
Corbeau
sigur
rocknrolf
xandr
dion
jwrober
Alfred
Wahazar
Hans_Lemurson
Lord_P
JamesNYC
Narti
louis94
Momo
Temmikael
Noobs: These players are either first-timers, or have very few games under their belt, or I simply don't know enough about their skill.
emilio
zoe
shoter
kingi
MOLIX
anaxagoras
kunki
ghamath
Orisson
pieronjeden
wolfie31
SKB
Note: If you are in the "Noob" category and think you're better than that, don't be insulted. I'm making decisions based on limited information. Maybe somebody who is wiser than me will draft you for their team. I have only played in LT44, and maybe you've done better in other games. My rankings say more about me than you.
Last edited by Hans_Lemurson on Sun Aug 26, 2018 2:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Hans_Lemurson
- Member
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am